One AITTP student in the article states, “We have to make
sure that our people know how to read and write, and that they have someone in
front of them who understands what it means to be Indian.” (Brayboy, 426) The
article also talks about self-identification, and how important it is for groups
to “define themselves, their place in the world, and their traditions.”
(Brayboy, 435) To what extent is it possible to understand a culture other than
your own without having grown up immersed in it? Is it possible for a teacher
to have a sufficient understanding of a culture without having the outward
appearance and history that reflects that culture or does a teacher need to be
similar to students in order to help them in the process of defining
themselves?
Brayboy discusses the notion that the goal of U.S. society
is to “civilize” American Indians by replacing their heritage with English
culture. However, in order for individuals to thrive they need knowledge of their
past, present and future as the article describes culture, knowledge, and power
as all being intertwined. Looking specifically in an educational setting and
the problematic idea of assimilation, what knowledge do American Indians need
to gain in education? In other words, what is an “appropriate” education that
will teach American Indians both the necessary academic knowledge as well as
allow them to maintain their cultural identity?
Think of an image people may have of your culture. Does it
reflect the reality of who you are? Think again about what we discussed last
week in our group and what it may be like to check the “other” box on an
application. TribalCrit values the importance of stories as a legitimate form
of data to make up theory and remind us of our origins. Looking back at the
stories you told in your autoenthnography, what does this tell you about where
you come from and what would you want younger members of your community to take
away from your stories?
No comments:
Post a Comment